This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
Медведев вышел в финал турнира в Дубае17:59
。safew官方版本下载对此有专业解读
Израиль нанес удар по Ирану09:28。关于这个话题，WPS官方版本下载提供了深入分析
`@receiver staticPart: `@arg2 `anyKeywordPart: `@arg1It’s incredibly powerful. But how do you remember all of this?